NASA ENGINEERING NETWORK
Follow this link to skip to the main content
+ Contact LLIS
Go
ABOUT NASALATEST NEWSMULTIMEDIAMISSIONSMyNASAWORK FOR NASA

+ NASA Home
FIND ENGINEERING RESOURCES BY
LLIS HOME
NASA CENTERS
MISSION DIRECTORATE
TOPICS
BY YEAR


Public Lessons Learned Entry: 1093

Lesson Info:

  • Lesson Number: 1093
  • Lesson Date: 2002-01-01
  • Submitting Organization: ARC
  • Submitted by: Joan Salute / Dr. Mendoza

Subject:

Manufacturing one-of-a-kind or cutting edge technology

Description of Driving Event:

The Project chose a commercial vendor to build a unique piece of hardware for a one-shot NASA launch mission. In addition to its contract with NASA, this vendor had several repeat high volume customers. Therefore, as commitments to other customers taxed the vendor's resources, the vendor demoted NASA's requirements to a lower priority and were not able to meet schedule or cost. An alternate vendor had to be brought in to help in the recovery and the Project was forced to accept additional risk in the flight hardware.

Lesson(s) Learned:

The risk involved between using in-house hardware manufacturing shops and commercial vendors should be weighed carefully. For several reasons including attrition and Center priorities, In-house capabilities may lack the experience and resources to meet Project requirements. However, their proximity and familiarity with NASA missions may overcome this. On the other hand, while a commercial vendor may appear to have both the experience and resources to meet Project requirements, they actually may have less capability than their NASA in-house counterparts to devote to the Project due to their non-Project commitments.

Recommendation(s):

When developing NASA unique and/or one-shot hardware for launches and missions, strongly consider using in-house shops and processing instead of commercial manufacturers who may give priority to their repeat high volume customers and thereby increase the risk to NASA's interest. In cases where a commercial manufacturer is used, monitor the work during the process closely to ensure it remains on schedule, meets specifications for materials, environmental stresses, and tolerances.

Evidence of Recurrence Control Effectiveness:

N/A

Documents Related to Lesson:

N/A

Mission Directorate(s):

  • Exploration Systems
  • Science
  • Space Operations
  • Aeronautics Research

Additional Key Phrase(s):

  • Administration/Organization
  • Flight Equipment
  • Hardware
  • Procurement Small Business & Industrial Relations
  • Risk Management/Assessment

Additional Info:

    Approval Info:

    • Approval Date: 2002-02-12
    • Approval Name: Anthony Briceno
    • Approval Organization: ARC
    • Approval Phone Number: 650-604-1012


    FirstGov - Your First Click to the US Government
    + 2004 Vision for Space Exploration
    + FY 2005 Budget Request
    + 2003 Strategic Plan
    + Freedom of Information Act
    + The President's Management Agenda
    + FY 2003 Agency Performance and Accountability Report
    + NASA Privacy Statement, Disclaimer,
    and Accessibility Certification

    + Freedom to Manage
    NASA
    Curator:Manson Yew
    NASA Official: Gregory Robinson
    + Contact LLIS