NASA ENGINEERING NETWORK
Follow this link to skip to the main content
+ Contact LLIS
Go
ABOUT NASALATEST NEWSMULTIMEDIAMISSIONSMyNASAWORK FOR NASA

+ NASA Home
FIND ENGINEERING RESOURCES BY
LLIS HOME
NASA CENTERS
MISSION DIRECTORATE
TOPICS
BY YEAR


Public Lessons Learned Entry: 0702

Lesson Info:

  • Lesson Number: 0702
  • Lesson Date: 1999-02-01
  • Submitting Organization: JPL
  • Submitted by: Wil Harkins

Subject:

Magnetic Design Control for Science Instruments

Abstract:

Preferred Practice for Design & Test. Magnetometer experiment data will be corrupted by variable and unpredictable spacecraft residual magnetic field noise, thus limiting the accuracy of the magnetic field experiment. Design flight subsystems with low residual dipole magnetic fields to maintain the spacecraft's total static and dynamic magnetic fields within science requirements.

Description of Driving Event:

This Lessons Learned is based on Reliability Practice No. PD-ED-1207; from NASA Technical Memorandum 4322A, NASA Reliability Preferred Practices for Design and Test.

Benefit:

Provides for a magnetically clean spacecraft, which increases the quality and accuracy of interplanetary and planetary magnetic field data gathered during the mission.

Implementation Method:

Because the dipolar portion of a spacecraft's magnetic field at its magnetometer experiment sensor location dominates the nondipolar part, each spacecraft subsystem is assigned a maximum allowable dipole magnetic field specification based on the magnetometer sensor sensitivity and the distance between the bulk of the subsystems and the sensor location. A typical maximum dipolar field allocation is 10 nanoTeslas (gammas) at a distance of 1 meter from the geometric center of a spacecraft's subsystem, assuming the magnetometer sensor is mounted at the end of an 8-meter boom.

To ensure that each subsystem will meet its respective dipole field specification, several design practices are observed during the early stages of the subsystem design. These practices include:

  1. Magnetic Shielding of Magnetic Components

    A magnetic source can be enclosed in a high permeability material shield, which in effect confines the source's magnetic flux to within the walls of the shield enclosure. The shield should be completely enveloping, with the minimum number of holes and cutouts. The shield must be annealed after all machining and forming operations are completed. A general rule of thumb is to design the shield to operate within the linear range of the permeability curve between points A and B.

    refer to [D] description[D]


  2. Compensation of Magnetic Components

    A magnetic component can be neutralized by placing on or near its surface an equal but opposite field vector using compensation magnets or current loops.

    refer to [D] description[D]


  3. Redesign of Circuit Board Current Paths to Reduce Loop Area Coverage

    Because a magnetic field B is proportional to loop area geometry A, number of loop turns N, and current flow I through a circuit, a reduction in A produces a reduction in the magnetic field B, while still leaving I and N intact.
    refer to [D] description[D]


  4. Replacement of Ferromagnetic Parts with Nonmagnetic Parts

    Another method for reducing magnetic fields is by simply replacing ferrous materials with nonmagnetic materials, preferably with relative permeability mr of approximately 1 so that the magnetic susceptibility cm is kept at approximately 0.
    refer to [D] description[D]

    where m = momr, mr = 1 + cm, and mo is the permeability of vacuum.

All spacecraft subsystems are individually subjected to a testing program aimed at fully characterizing each of the subsystems' magnetic traits, as well as determining compliance with dipole field specifications. This testing program includes several exposures to magnetizing fields of 25 Gauss and 3 Gauss to uncover easily permeable materials contained within the subsystem, and several exposures to demagnetizing fields of 50 Gauss and 40 Gauss to eliminate or reduce a subsystem's residual magnetic field.

Based on the above test program, a data base is established containing subsystem information such as the X, Y, and Z spacecraft coordinates, maximum and minimum measured static magnetic fields, measured dynamic fields, and the calculated dipole moment components. From this data base, the total spacecraft static and dynamic dipole fields at the magnetometer sensor location are calculated using computer code, and are continually updated as new information becomes available. Results then are compared with the spacecraft's static and dynamic magnetic field science requirements.

Technical Rationale:

A spacecraft's total allowable magnetic field at the magnetometer sensor location r usually is determined by the sensor's sensitivity level or by an agreed upon science requirement. The total field can be approximated by N number of dipoles, with N representing all of the spacecraft subsystems. To guarantee that the spacecraft's total magnetic field at r is within the desired allowable range, the individual moments due to N number of dipole sources must be kept to within predetermined dipole moment specifications. These individual specifications are derived by distributing the total allowable spacecraft moment amongst N number of spacecraft sources using a model that consists of a number of randomly oriented dipoles of strength Mj. The magnitude of the spacecraft's dipole magnetic moment is approximated by the Pythagorean sum of these individual subsystem dipole moments, with the radial part tending to be greater than either of the transverse components for the dipole portion. The individual magnetic dipole field allocation, therefore, is determined from this model by the following equations:

refer to [D] description[D]


where BR,BQ, and BF are the field components of the spacecraft's magnetometer experiment sensor sensitivity or the science requirement levels at location r. Thus, Mj can be determined for all spacecraft N sources assuming that Mj is the same for all j and the magnetic moments determining the far field are linear functions of the vectors Mj. Because the dipolar portion of the spacecraft magnetic field dominates the nondipolar part and the spacecraft is dominated by the few largest sources, the general field allocation Bs for a subsystem at a normalized distance of R meters is thus derived from Mj as follows:
refer to [D] description[D]


By ensuring that the dipole moment specifications of all spacecraft subsystems, as represented by N number of dipolar sources, are within their respective allocated dipole moment specifications, the overall spacecraft magnetic field at the magnetometer sensor location can be kept to within its science requirement or to below the magnetometer's sensitivity level. Final verification is done by measuring the magnetic fields of all spacecraft subsystems and, subsequently, calculating the magnitude and orientation of their respective dipole moment components Mxj, Myj, and Mzj at spacecraft coordinates Xj,Yj, and Zj. The total spacecraft magnetic field at the magnetometer sensor location r then can be modeled using computer code to verify compliance with the specified science requirement or magnetometer experiment sensitivity.

Lesson(s) Learned:

Magnetometer experiment data will be corrupted with variable and unpredictable spacecraft residual magnetic field noise, thus limiting the accuracy of the magnetic field experiment.

Recommendation(s):

Design flight subsystems with low residual dipole magnetic fields to maintain the spacecraft's total static and dynamic magnetic fields within science requirements.

Evidence of Recurrence Control Effectiveness:

This practice has been used on Mariner series, Voyager (VGR), Galileo (GLL), Ulysses.

Documents Related to Lesson:

N/A

Mission Directorate(s):

  • Exploration Systems
  • Science
  • Space Operations
  • Aeronautics Research

Additional Key Phrase(s):

  • Flight Equipment
  • Hardware
  • Launch Vehicle
  • Payloads
  • Spacecraft

Additional Info:

    Approval Info:

    • Approval Date: 2000-03-15
    • Approval Name: Eric Raynor
    • Approval Organization: QS
    • Approval Phone Number: 202-358-4738


    FirstGov - Your First Click to the US Government
    + 2004 Vision for Space Exploration
    + FY 2005 Budget Request
    + 2003 Strategic Plan
    + Freedom of Information Act
    + The President's Management Agenda
    + FY 2003 Agency Performance and Accountability Report
    + NASA Privacy Statement, Disclaimer,
    and Accessibility Certification

    + Freedom to Manage
    NASA
    Curator:Celeste Merryman
    NASA Official: Gregory Robinson
    + Contact LLIS